Two trucks with engines running advertise free GPU time for AI in front of the Council of State. The irony? Burning diesel to promote a technology that is itself energy-intensive. A symbol of our paradoxes.
In front of the Council of State, a stone’s throw from the Ministry of Culture, two trucks are parked with their engines running, their screens broadcasting advertisements for free GPU hours. This advertisement thus promotes the use of artificial intelligence, whose voracity for electricity and natural resources is well known. The irony is striking: for the first time, I discover an advertisement conveyed in this way, by two immobilized trucks, engines purring, burning fossil fuels to promote a technology that is itself a major energy consumer. This energy mise en abyme is of an almost disturbing coherence. Is this a performance art piece? I doubt it.
This scene, captured on July 8, 2025 in front of one of France’s highest administrative courts, crystallizes the paradoxes of our digital age. Scaleway, the cloud subsidiary of the Iliad group, offers the chance to win up to one million euros worth of free GPU hours, an enticing offer for developers and companies wishing to exploit the computing power necessary for training AI models.
The image is strikingly contradictory. On one hand, these mobile advertising vehicles, parked but with engines running, directly emit CO2 into the Parisian atmosphere. On the other, they promote a technology whose carbon footprint continues to grow. According to the International Energy Agency, data centers already consume about 1% of global electricity, a figure that could double by 2026 with the explosion of generative AI.
Training a single large language model can emit as much CO2 as five American cars over their entire lifetime. GPUs (Graphics Processing Units), these graphics processors repurposed for AI, are particularly energy-intensive: a single one can consume up to 700 watts under intensive operation. For example, Microsoft installed 25,000 GPUs in France in 2024.
The choice of location is not insignificant. Facing the Council of State, guardian of administrative legality and regularly consulted on environmental issues, this advertising demonstration takes on an almost provocative dimension. A few meters from the Ministry of Culture, an institution meant to preserve our common heritage, we celebrate a technological race whose ecological consequences question what we will leave to future generations.
This marketing campaign perfectly illustrates what philosopher Bernard Stiegler called “generalized proletarianization”: we are invited to consume ever more computing power without questioning the purposes or consequences. The advertised “free” masks the real costs—environmental, social, ethical—of this technological headlong rush.
This Parisian street scene is not just an urban curiosity. It reveals the profound tensions between technological innovation and climate urgency. While France has committed to reducing its emissions by 55% by 2030, the digital sector continues its exponential growth, driven by promises of efficiency that struggle to offset the rebound effect of multiplying uses.
Artificial intelligence is not inherently harmful. It can help optimize energy networks, improve productivity and weather forecasting, or accelerate scientific research. But its massive deployment, encouraged by campaigns like this one, raises the question of digital sobriety and the prioritization of our real needs.
Facing these screen-trucks, one cannot help but think that they perfectly embody our era: a profusion of technical means to promote even more technology, in a spiral where the question of meaning gets lost in the noise of engines and the glitter of pixels.
Artificial intelligence has emancipated itself from research laboratories and works of science fiction thanks to the public launch in November 2022 of the conversational robot ChatGPT, which was very quickly appropriated by an immense number of people internationally, in professional, educational and even private contexts. The fact that artificial intelligence has now been identified by the human community as part of everyday life finally opens the door to critical awareness on this subject.
Of course, artificial intelligence concerns industry, work, creation, copyright... and we need to anticipate its future productive uses, in order to stay “up to date”. But to accompany our lives as they integrate this new facet, it seems to me essential to produce a critical thought, i.e. to put ourselves in a position to reflect on what is happening to us, what is changing us, to remain lucid and capable of freedom of thought and action.
What is “critical thinking”? It means questioning, from the outside, practices that have been internalized. To do this, I believe that experimentation, cultural action, play and hijacking are highly effective tools for research, exploration, dissemination and reflection. For me, research is collaborative, and intelligence is collective and creative. This requires good methods of cooperation, between human beings and with machines. Here, I bring together stories of experience, methodological texts and practical ideas. I share concrete ways in which artificial intelligence, like any other tool, can be invested in the service of humanism.
Here are a few openings for critical thinking on AI, in the form of questions: