Analyze your project using the Fribourg Declaration

28 June 2021. Published by Benoît Labourdette.
  3 min
 |  Download in PDF

How to set in motion an approach open to cultural rights, that is to say, to put more democracy in the projects and the relationship with the public? A good way to start is to analyze your project according to the 8 cultural rights proposed by the “Fribourg Declaration” (2007). This is just the beginning.

The « cultural rights », to which several articles of law in France refer, are in themselves a concept that has multiple definitions, with no consensus or official text that would define it in a fixed way. The “Fribourg Declaration” is not a ratified legislative text, it is a proposal for the formalization of cultural rights, which is considered the most accomplished. It is extremely useful in political terms, because even if it is not in itself a legislative text, its proposals are all based on legal texts that can be mobilized at the legal level.

We can therefore use the Fribourg Declaration to analyze its project, using the 8 “cultural rights” it identifies. This is an exercise that can be done in teams. We ask ourselves the question “how does my project take into account these 8 cultural rights”, and we share and discuss the answers:

  • The right to choose and respect one’s cultural identity.
  • The right to know and respect one’s own culture, as well as other cultures.
  • The right to have access to cultural heritages.
  • The right to refer, or not, to one or more cultural communities.
  • The right to participate in cultural life.
  • The right to educate and train in the respect of cultural identities.
  • The right to participate in an adequate information (to be informed and to inform).
  • The right to participate in the development of cultural cooperation.

Link to the complete Freiburg declaration.

These questions, if we take the time to approach them through real personal work and collective exchanges, raise issues that are often very profound. They are really operative to perceive one’s project in a completely different way, with a view to democracy. The Paideia action-research approach accompanies these questions over a period of a year and a half for those who commit themselves to it, by transmitting a method to make it live on the ground, with successive and collective evaluations.

8 starting points for a very demanding approach

These 8 cultural rights really allow us to dig deep into the why of projects, their raison d’être in the light of the democratic system that allows them to be funded. This seems to me an excellent starting point. But it’s only a start, because the key, after that, is the question of how:

  • How do we get human beings to implement, in movement rather, the answers found to these questions?
  • How can we accompany, without hypocrisy, the profound changes in modes of organization, governance, hierarchy, professional and personal practices, which necessarily result from a sincere opening to cultural rights?
  • How can people and institutions, whether public or private, integrate the destabilization (deep questioning of established practices, need for new practices, especially digital) that a cultural rights approach represents?
  • To summarize it very quickly: how to accept to lose power, how to accept to be changed?
  • What management methods should be used, and how can we support this type of change in a sustainable way, especially among multiple partners, which will affect the heart of projects, professions, social relations, institutional structures, and personal postures?
  • How can we avoid, with the best intentions in the world, perverting the initial democratic objectives without even realizing it?
  • How to keep an open and evolving framework?

This first analysis with the help of the Fribourg Declaration can therefore constitute an excellent starting point. But the implementation of cultural rights is another matter, which must be nourished by other, very destabilizing, approaches that require a long and demanding personal, collective and institutional, in short political, path. It is necessary to take the measure of it.

The “cultural rights”, which derive from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are a concept developed and defended by researchers, sociologists, philosophers, political leaders and actors of the cultural world. Present in a certain number of articles of law since 2001, the cultural rights aim at highlighting and formalizing, in order to be able to make them operative, the principles of a “cultural democracy”. To summarize it quickly, it is a question of each person being able to give value to his or her personal culture, in order to be able to exercise his or her citizenship: to express himself or herself, to defend his or her point of view, to create, to develop his or her practices, to have access to a cultural diversity, etc. Cultural rights operate in a much wider field than that of the strict cultural sector.

The notion of “cultural rights” is present in France in the laws NOTRe (2015) and LCAP (2016). It is carried by a delegation of the Ministry of Culture (General Delegation for transmission, territories, since January 1, 2021).

Paradoxically, cultural rights are difficult to implement in the cultural sector, which is traditionally rather attached to “cultural democratization”: one often defends the idea of the transmission to the public of works of art of the best possible quality, according to a principle of hierarchy of “cultural values”. Thus, the cultural rights can be lived by certain professionals of the culture as a dangerous dynamics for the Art, a tendency towards the amateur practices, which is not the case.

In my point of view, which is that of a practitioner/researcher in the cultural field, cultural rights are above all a practice, an exercise of democracy in the very methods of organization of the work, of the relation to the other and of the place of each one, the choices of programming, the methods of mediation and animation of workshops, the mode of territorial inscription of the cultural policy, etc.

I propose in this section concrete working methods for good practices of implementation of cultural rights, based on my field experiences, as well as a sharing of more theoretical reflections, in the framework of my own research on cultural rights.

I place myself in the filiation of thinkers like John Dewey. But cultural rights cannot be presented without mentioning Patrice Meyer-Bisch, Jean-Michel Lucas, Christelle Blouët, the “Fribourg Declaration”, etc.


QR Code for this page
qrcode:https://www.benoitlabourdette.com/la-recherche-et-l-innovation/les-droits-culturels/analyser-son-projet-a-l-aide-de-la-declaration-de-fribourg