Research-action “Image Education 2.1”

14 February 2018. Published by Benoît Labourdette.
  2 min
 |  Download in PDF

Collaborative action-research project led by Benoît Labourdette production in 2018 and 2019, to develop the synergy between teenage cinema attendance and cultural action.

In co-production and co-piloting with Arcadi, ACRIF, Images Forum and ACAP.

Useful information

Presentation text

In recent decades, our relationship with images has evolved considerably. In addition to their current omnipresence, it is our relationship to their creation and dissemination that has changed. The advent of digital technology allows us to be both a producer and a broadcaster of images. Young people play a central role in these contemporary practices: they film, publish and share images. Faced with this observation, it seems necessary for educational actions in the field of images and cultural policies to reinvent themselves in order to take these new realities into account.

In connection with this development of digital uses, the missions of traditional broadcasting venues are also evolving. As the possibilities of access to film works multiply within domestic spaces, the functions of cinemas are expanding and diversifying. Although their primary vocation lies in the distribution of films in order to allow the audience to meet the work, the cinemas also develop a reflection based on their anchoring within a territory: a place of socialization, cross-fertilization, exhibition, creation, and so on.

The project “Images Education 2.1” wishes to accompany this reflection on the new practices of education in images in transversality with the actors of the diffusion and in real inscription within the physical and digital territories. Combining research and action, it will be at the intersection of theoretical reflections and field experiments. The aim is to produce useful methodological resources for professionals, on the future platform www.educationauximages.fr, as well as the publication of a book at the end of 2019.

The “cultural rights”, which derive from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are a concept developed and defended by researchers, sociologists, philosophers, political leaders and actors of the cultural world. Present in a certain number of articles of law since 2001, the cultural rights aim at highlighting and formalizing, in order to be able to make them operative, the principles of a “cultural democracy”. To summarize it quickly, it is a question of each person being able to give value to his or her personal culture, in order to be able to exercise his or her citizenship: to express himself or herself, to defend his or her point of view, to create, to develop his or her practices, to have access to a cultural diversity, etc. Cultural rights operate in a much wider field than that of the strict cultural sector.

The notion of “cultural rights” is present in France in the laws NOTRe (2015) and LCAP (2016). It is carried by a delegation of the Ministry of Culture (General Delegation for transmission, territories, since January 1, 2021).

Paradoxically, cultural rights are difficult to implement in the cultural sector, which is traditionally rather attached to “cultural democratization”: one often defends the idea of the transmission to the public of works of art of the best possible quality, according to a principle of hierarchy of “cultural values”. Thus, the cultural rights can be lived by certain professionals of the culture as a dangerous dynamics for the Art, a tendency towards the amateur practices, which is not the case.

In my point of view, which is that of a practitioner/researcher in the cultural field, cultural rights are above all a practice, an exercise of democracy in the very methods of organization of the work, of the relation to the other and of the place of each one, the choices of programming, the methods of mediation and animation of workshops, the mode of territorial inscription of the cultural policy, etc.

I propose in this section concrete working methods for good practices of implementation of cultural rights, based on my field experiences, as well as a sharing of more theoretical reflections, in the framework of my own research on cultural rights.

I place myself in the filiation of thinkers like John Dewey. But cultural rights cannot be presented without mentioning Patrice Meyer-Bisch, Jean-Michel Lucas, Christelle Blouët, the “Fribourg Declaration”, etc.


See also
QR Code for this page
qrcode:https://www.benoitlabourdette.com/la-recherche-et-l-innovation/les-droits-culturels/recherche-action-education-aux-images-2-1