The World Café is a collective intelligence technique that fosters the collaborative creation of ideas and concrete projects. Through successive rotations, groups enrich different themes, allowing each participant to contribute to the overall reflections within a structured yet flexible framework.
You’ve probably heard of, if not participated in or organized yourself, a World Café. It’s a proven collective intelligence technique, but one that can be adapted to suit individual needs. My version, which has proven effective in numerous professional situations, is a personal adaptation of this method.
The World Café is useful when there’s a need to collectively generate ideas, work paths, or projects. It’s an exercise that can lead to concrete actions, which has happened several times in the World Cafés I’ve organized.
Let’s take an example: a number of cultural leaders from several French institutes in a specific geographic area participated in a World Café I organized. The goal was to jointly define film distribution projects that could both better reach target audiences and create synergy between the different institutes.
For me, the first step in a World Café is to conduct a collective brainstorming session. I do this using mind mapping. This allows the group to define concrete work paths or specific themes that will later be explored in detail by the working groups. Of course, themes can also be imposed for a World Café, but in the example I’m using, there were no imposed themes. The general brainstorming session allowed ideas to emerge, such as:
Thus, it was necessary to start with this brainstorming.
After the brainstorming, tables are set up. Each table corresponds to one of the work themes. The participants are divided into as many groups as there are tables. Each table has a host who will facilitate the discussion and take notes. The initial idea is that each group contributes to each of the themes.
Imagine there are four themes (four tables) and around thirty participants. This makes roughly four groups of eight people. For twenty minutes, they sit at a table and work together to develop their reflections, proposals, or concrete ideas to address the question or theme at hand. They have large sheets of paper, markers, and the table host takes notes on all their contributions.
After 20 minutes, the groups rotate and move to another table. When they arrive at the new table, the host gives them a quick summary of what was discussed during the first round. Additionally, the written notes are preserved, allowing the newcomers to avoid repeating what has already been said and to enrich the reflections started by the previous group. Then, a third round, followed by a fourth round: in this way, everyone contributes to each table.
Finally, there’s a break of at least fifteen minutes. During this break, the table hosts prepare their public presentation using a graphic representation of the project.
Each table host presents what was developed in five to ten minutes, followed by a ten-minute debate on the topic to further enrich it. In the example I gave, very concrete projects emerged from this World Café and were implemented within the French institutes.
If this exercise is conducted with attentiveness, particularly in terms of pacing (for example, if you notice that participants need 25 or 30 minutes instead of 20), it’s important to remain flexible and adaptable. You really need to guide the participants, and in this case, it can lead to very rich outcomes. Rigidity in organization should be avoided.
In the context of businesses, as well as in associative, social, artistic, cultural mediation, cultural action, initial or professional training, and social action settings, mobilizing the collective intelligence of participants is a very powerful lever. It enables mutual enrichment, improved relationships, stronger cohesion, the emergence of ideas, the invention of projects, greater engagement, and more.
Collective intelligence tools are also powerful democratic tools. They have been largely developed within the field of popular education, where the contribution of each individual is valued far more than in the national education system, which, in France, unfortunately often remains too traditional in its approaches.
I have frequently participated in collective intelligence workshops, and I have facilitated, applied, refined, adapted, and even invented a number of them. Here, you will find a collection of tools that I have personally used, which are integrated into the methods I propose, supported by real-life use cases. I believe these tools are highly worth sharing, as I have seen so many beneficial effects from them! I often find myself thinking, during collective moments such as conferences, for example: it’s a shame to limit ourselves to passive listening—all these minds gathered together could, if mobilized more effectively, produce something greater collectively.