The symbolic third is a concept that may seem very abstract, but for me it is very effective in creating a constructive link, especially between adults and youth. Here is a short synthesis of it, as I understand it.
To propose a concept that can be used as a pedagogical method, I’ve added the terms “third” and “symbolic”. One might object that this is a shortcut that misunderstands and misuses the depths of these two terms, each of which belongs to a vast and distinct theoretical field. In fact, in the context of human relations, it seems to me to be very useful to associate the third party with a symbolization function; for me, it is through this association that these theories become operative in terms of capacity for action. For me, it’s not a question of making things simplistic, but simply of applying them to the power to act in concrete situations (which doesn’t mean reducing them to this instrumentalization).
For a more in-depth look at these two subjects, their theories, histories and controversies, here are a few suggestions for further reading:
Here you will find educational tools, practical and conceptual. These tools are based on the experiences and thinking that I have been developing in a large number of contexts since the 1990s. I have developed a singular, operative pedagogical practice, inspired by Célestin Freinet’s methods among others, adapted to contemporary human issues and to the tools of the 21st Century.
Pedagogy is an experimental practice, which has its theories, its history and its thinkers. It is a central construction tool in the educational field but also beyond, in the framework of professional interactions or cultural mediation for example. Thus the usefulness of the methods and reflections you will find here goes beyond the context of teaching.