On 5 and 6 May 2026, Chaillot, Théâtre National de la Danse, hosts the second edition of the « Chaillot Augmenté x TMNlab Meetings: Performing arts and digital environments » conference. Around thirty speakers from France, Germany, Belgium, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Quebec and Taiwan; two days of round tables, focus sessions, expert workshops and demonstrations; a curated selection of VR works available throughout. The event is free and open to all upon registration. It raises a set of political questions about what culture is becoming as digital technology reshapes our practices, and these questions reach well beyond the boundaries of the professional sector alone.
The TMNlab is a network founded in 2013 that today brings together more than 1,500 members: artists, performing arts professionals, researchers, and people working in the technology and cultural policy fields. It is also a registered training organisation. Its team describes itself as « facilitators », whose role is to interconnect people and practices, and to support what they call the performing arts and digital environments ecosystem in formation. The wording is apt. Practices are inventing themselves and searching for their forms, in a moment when no one holds the answers.
What makes this network valuable is its rigour. The TMNlab does not treat digital technology as a compulsory modernity, it questions it. In the preparatory work for these meetings, the team raises questions such as: « How can we maintain artistic exploration that is free, critical and diverse? ». Or: « How can we resist the potential role of leisure technologies as a Trojan horse? ». Or again: « Can we avoid the “scaling-up” logic of the creative and cultural industries and preserve the diversity of the performing arts’ unique qualities within an industrial economy? ». The 2026 edition explicitly aims, to quote the preparatory work again, to « shift the focus away from a fascination for technology and innovation and towards the responsibility of practices ». Such formulations are uncommon in the current landscape of discourse on digital culture, and they deserve support.
To learn more about the network: tmnlab.com.
The organisers’ preparatory work is built around four threads that give these two days their true meaning.
First thread: a long history, not a rupture
The performing arts have never been outside technology. Baroque automata, mechanical stage effects, amplified sound, lighting design, the first video recordings, contemporary immersive environments: each era has redefined the conditions of presence and the regimes of perception. Research on virtual realities, from the 1990s onwards, drew on the vocabulary of the stage, on dramaturgy, on the legacy of Antonin Artaud. What we are living through today extends this history into a new phase, faster and more political. What is being transformed reaches beyond technique. Our relationship to co-presence, our way of forming community, the very conditions of collective experience.
Franck Bauchard (DGCA, formerly the founder of La Panacée in Montpellier) opens the first day on « Performing arts of the (retro)future ». The round table « Programming hybrid works: tools, networks and repertoire-building », with Marie Pia Bureau (ONDA), Séverine Bouisset (Les Gémeaux) and Julie Sanerot (MAC Créteil), extends this question on the side of dissemination. Rosita Boisseau (Le Monde) draws the conclusions.
Second thread: artistic gestures, not technological showcases
« After the euphoria of innovation, let us take a moment to reflect ». The wording is the organisers’, and I find it apt. Discourses on digital technology often swing between fascination and rejection. The Chaillot round tables raise sharper questions. How can we maintain free artistic exploration when the promise of immersive art has at times led to economic concentration and aesthetic standardisation? How can we resist the potential role of leisure technologies as a « Trojan horse »? How can we preserve the singular qualities of the performing arts in the face of the « scaling-up » logic of the creative and cultural industries? With the rise of AI, a dominant narrative is taking hold, that of a creative process individualised, automated, optimised. The artistic practices invited to Chaillot often point in another direction, towards collective, situated and critical reappropriation.
This is the subject of several key sessions. « The illusion of opportunity: is the immersive economy redefining creation? » with Alexander Whitley, Julien Dubuc and Clémence Debaig, moderated by Myriam Achard. « Artists’ voices », a long sequence with Natacha Paquignon, Mathieu Chamagne, Marco Donnarumma, Joséphine Derobe, Isis Fahmy, Singing Chen and Frédéric Deslias, moderated by Chrystèle Bazin, which includes a « Focus 404: when the bug arrives » that promises to be fascinating. And « Navigating an ecosystem in transformation without sacrificing artistic integrity » with Marie du Chastel (KIKK Belgium).
Third thread: the place of the spectator
On Wednesday 6 May at 11.45 am, I am taking part in the round table « Audiences: how is digital technology reshaping the relationship to the performing arts? », alongside Rachid Ouramdane (Chaillot) and Nicolas Ligeon (Théâtre de l’Élysée, Sous les Néons collective), moderated by Anne Le Gall.
The organisers set the frame with a phrase I gladly take up: « the spectator is no longer in their place, and that is good news ». What digital technology transforms also touches the very place of the spectator. In many experiments, the spectator explores, acts, influences, sometimes co-produces. They go through an experience rather than receive a work. The preparatory dossier adds an intuition I find apt: « to transform the place of the spectator is first to displace oneself ».
The animation guidelines for the round table raise two questions that I find of particular interest. « What new definition of hospitality should we adopt to respond to new practices? ». « Are audiences still looking for an institution as a point of entry? ». That is where I would like to push the discussion further.
My own way in is to extend these intuitions to the end of their political consequences. If the spectator changes place, then so must the institution. Major publicly funded theatres are extraordinary places, vast, well-equipped, financed by public taxation. They could become, for a significant share of their activity, resource-places at the service of the creative practices of inhabitants. Places where professional expertise supports the creative work of those who come, citizens in a broad sense and not only the « targeted » audiences. With, of course, performances as well, when these meet real expectations within the territory, including amateur performances on major stages, which are very much in demand. I raise the question in a spirit of dialogue with the other speakers.
I have developed these ideas at greater length in a recent article: Rebuilding the Democratic Function of Major Performing Arts Venues.
Fourth thread: the real challenge is organisational, not technological
« The real challenge is not technological but organisational ». The wording is once again the organisers’, and it is one of the aspects of their work that matters most to me. What is blocking the sector’s evolution has less to do with tools than with production logics, funding frameworks, professional cultures, role assignments. Difficulty in welcoming hybrid projects, lack of time for experimentation, tension between innovation and structural constraints, all of these blockages reveal a gap between the artistic forms now emerging and the frameworks within which we attempt to produce them.
This thread structures much of the second day. Sarah Ellis (Royal Shakespeare Company) opens with « Leading and practising in the digital age ». Clément Thibault (Le Cube Garges) and Lisa Mara Ahrens (HAU Berlin) deepen the discussion in « After innovation: towards an ecology of transformation ». This round table, according to the organisers, aims to « shift the focus away from a fascination for technology and innovation and towards the responsibility of practices », with themes that speak to me: responsible innovation, digital sobriety, new economic and ethical models, redefining artistic and social value. The closing choral session, « Performing arts and digital environments: what kinds of synergy do we need? », brings together about ten key actors (ZINC, CHRONIQUES/HACNUM, Pôle PIXEL, PXN, La Fabrique de la Danse, City of Marmande, Avignon University, ONDA) for a collective mapping.
The political stakes of these two days extend beyond the perimeter of the performing arts. The place of digital technology in our cultural practices, the transformation of the relationship to audiences, the funding of venues, the real or simulated democratisation of institutions, the very definition of cultural hospitality, these questions concern the city as a whole. All those who fund culture through their taxes, those who do not visit cultural venues and wonder why, those who practise another artistic discipline, those who work in education, social work, research, local government, and who can see that culture is a question of society.
Multidisciplinarity asserts itself as a fact, not a choice. The questions raised at Chaillot run across the visual arts, cinema, music, literature, heritage, design, video games, mediation. A dialogue confined to a single professional sub-sector would miss the transformation now underway.
Professional gatherings often follow a largely top-down format, with structured presentations and audience questions arriving at the end. The organisers of Chaillot Augmenté have worked to diversify the formats, with small-group sessions, interactive focus moments, choral mapping. This is useful and necessary. The top-down format nevertheless remains structural to this kind of meeting, and it is worth naming.
The expectation I would like to formulate, in dialogue with the spirit of the TMNlab, is that these two days be built as a shared elaboration, beyond a succession of presentations. The co-presence of people from different backgrounds is a resource. If we are speakers, let us be available to having the perspectives from the audience displace our discourse. If we are in the audience, let us speak up a little more than is planned, without polemic but without holding back what deserves to be said. A democratic system requires work to remain democratic. This expectation, I know, is not easy to put into practice, and that is why it is worth formulating.
Tuesday 5 May 2026
Expert Q&A sessions (Tuesday):
Wednesday 6 May 2026
Expert Q&A sessions (Wednesday):
Throughout: curated selection of VR works with Unframed Collection (Tuesday 1 pm - 6 pm, Wednesday 11.30 am - 5.30 pm).
Detailed programme and registration on tmnlab.com.
I have gathered my analyses, methods and proposals for a stronger cultural sector tomorrow in a freely available book, Defending Culture Differently : Methods for Tomorrow, recently updated. The book covers in particular cultural rights, cultural democracy, the place of institutions in the digital age, antifragile practices, artificial intelligence, renewed forms of mediation, and the political reconstruction of the cultural sector.
I had also taken the opportunity, at a TMNlab café, to develop the idea that digital technology is not a subject one should take a stand for or against, because it reconfigures far more fundamental questions: our relationship to presence and to relationship itself. Read or listen to this intervention.
Cultural policy" is a tradition of the French state since the Middle Ages. It was initiated by Louis XIV in the 17th century as a tool of influence and power. And it was defined in its current terms by André Malraux in 1959, with the State’s mission being the democratization of art in society. But today the cultural policies are multiple, because carried by the public authorities at other levels than that of the State (cities, agglomerations, departments, regions) and in many other places, in particular associative (places and cultural actions), individual (the initiatives of the artists, professionals or amateurs) and by private companies (trade of the culture).
The “digital revolution”, i.e. the ubiquitous, personalized and transitive access to information as well as the production by peers as a new model, deeply disrupts the “rules” of implementation of cultural policies, whether at the public or private level, and puts many actors in difficulty to reach their objectives. I propose here tools to understand the stakes of this “digital revolution” and concrete ways of working, hoping to bring useful resources to the work of cultural policies, in all types of contexts.