Workshop to find out what stage the partners had reached in their work on the “cultural rights” certification referential project in the context of professional training, to co-construct together (using the open forum method) reflections on specific aspects of the subject of pedagogy and cultural rights, and finally to work out avenues for collective action. I’ll go into a little more detail here about the two workshops I proposed.
Organized by UFISC, Opale, Réseau Culture 21, Observatoire des politiques culturelles, Laboratoire des droits culturels and Ligue de l’enseignement, on February 6, 2025 at Maison des métallos (Paris).
For the past three years, this group of players has been working on a skills repository for a “cultural rights” certification in the field of professional training. Three main skills have emerged:
Competence 1
Designing a working framework to take into account the diversity of people’s cultural references, enabling the development of expressive skills.
Competence 2
Analyze professional practice to identify the issues and problems involved in putting cultural rights to work, with reference to the corpus of fundamental human rights.
Competence 3
Formalize proposals for action to mobilize cultural rights effectively and continuously, identifying room for maneuver and possibilities for development in one’s professional context.
I proposed this workshop, which you can read the complete synthesis in mindmapping, because cultural rights seem to me to be an extremely operative notion for the benefit of the meaning of cultural projects, and are too often experienced as highly conceptual. To convey the values of respect for human dignity in certain contexts, it is probably not necessary to name them as such. To clarify points of view and approaches in this direction, I first proposed that we express the reason for our concern, then share our respective definitions of cultural rights, and finally outline the contexts, uses and challenges of naming or not naming cultural rights.
I proposed this workshop, which you can read the complete synthesis in mindmapping, because it seems to me that cultural rights could be mobilized with great profit to make the teaching devices evolve within the national education, and it is one of my subjects of work. I proposed first of all to share our respective concerns on this subject, and then to pool our experiences and proposals.
(photos: Alice-Anne Jeandel)
The “cultural rights”, which derive from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are a concept developed and defended by researchers, sociologists, philosophers, political leaders and actors of the cultural world. Present in a certain number of articles of law since 2001, the cultural rights aim at highlighting and formalizing, in order to be able to make them operative, the principles of a “cultural democracy”. To summarize it quickly, it is a question of each person being able to give value to his or her personal culture, in order to be able to exercise his or her citizenship: to express himself or herself, to defend his or her point of view, to create, to develop his or her practices, to have access to a cultural diversity, etc. Cultural rights operate in a much wider field than that of the strict cultural sector.
The notion of “cultural rights” is present in France in the laws NOTRe (2015) and LCAP (2016). It is carried by a delegation of the Ministry of Culture (General Delegation for transmission, territories, since January 1, 2021).
Paradoxically, cultural rights are difficult to implement in the cultural sector, which is traditionally rather attached to “cultural democratization”: one often defends the idea of the transmission to the public of works of art of the best possible quality, according to a principle of hierarchy of “cultural values”. Thus, the cultural rights can be lived by certain professionals of the culture as a dangerous dynamics for the Art, a tendency towards the amateur practices, which is not the case.
In my point of view, which is that of a practitioner/researcher in the cultural field, cultural rights are above all a practice, an exercise of democracy in the very methods of organization of the work, of the relation to the other and of the place of each one, the choices of programming, the methods of mediation and animation of workshops, the mode of territorial inscription of the cultural policy, etc.
I propose in this section concrete working methods for good practices of implementation of cultural rights, based on my field experiences, as well as a sharing of more theoretical reflections, in the framework of my own research on cultural rights.
I place myself in the filiation of thinkers like John Dewey. But cultural rights cannot be presented without mentioning Patrice Meyer-Bisch, Jean-Michel Lucas, Christelle Blouët, the “Fribourg Declaration”, etc.